I continue to read about the "rescinded offer" from Nazareth to W as outlined in my last post. While it seems the furor has cooled a little on the internet, I appreciate being challenged by a reader (a full 1/3 of them) and continue to read about the issue a bit.
My last post summarized comments and sites I had read and resonated with, particularly those that pointed out her requests for a delayed start, no more than three new preps a year for three years, and a pre-tenure sabbatical as being pretty unreasonable. The other issues were not unreasonable in my mind, esp. maternity leave.
OTOH, I can also resonate with the need to negotiate firmly at the beginning. This has touched our family as I outlined in a previous post.
A quote from David M Ball in IHE:
As for the argument that the successful candidate in this economic
climate, regardless of gender, should shut her mouth: at no other likely
juncture will a junior professor have a better opportunity to negotiate
the terms of her employment than at the moment of her hiring. The
conditions under which she is employed will dramatically shape her
chances for promotion and tenure. Negotiated terms matter to future
success. Indeed, the tenure track itself doesn’t accede to the logic of
the market.
I continue to think about how I will negotiate if offered a position at Hub's institution. Will I be intimidated to Lean In? Will I overshoot? At least, AT LEAST I have a job (and tenure) so the worst case scenario is status quo, commuter marriage and semi-single motherhood. The tenure's nice, single motherhood not at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment